Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 7:02:02 GMT 2
Athe author of the exception of unconstitutionality and were recorded in the conclusion of the meeting from that date when needing time for deliberated the Court postponed the pronouncement for November the date on which it pronounced this decision. COURT considering the doents and works of the file states the following . By the Conclusion of June pronounced in File no. the Ploieti Court of Appeal the Second Civil Admistrative and Fiscal Litigation Section notified the Constitutional Court with the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. lit. f and para. from Law no. of public notaries and notarial activity. The exception was raised by Mca.
Tudorancea plaintiff in a case with the object of canceling the order of the Miter Country Email List of Justice ordering the termination of the capacity of notary public and obliging the Mistry of Justice to fulfill the necessary formalities for the plaintiffs resumption of activity within BNP Tudorancea Moca. . In justifying the exception of unconstitutionality the author shows that at the time of committing the incriminated acts respectively on.
August and August the provisions of art. of Law no. which decreed regarding the quality of a notary that it ceases in the case of a final conviction for the intentional commission of a serious crime or that affects the prestige of the profession.of the act was to be carried out under the conditions of the Regulation on the application of Law no. and depending on this analysis the termination of the notary status was ordered. Art. para. from Law no. in the form existing at the time the acts were committed provided that the termination of the notarys capacity is determined or ordered as the case may be by the Mi#####ster of Justice specifying that in accordance with the.
Tudorancea plaintiff in a case with the object of canceling the order of the Miter Country Email List of Justice ordering the termination of the capacity of notary public and obliging the Mistry of Justice to fulfill the necessary formalities for the plaintiffs resumption of activity within BNP Tudorancea Moca. . In justifying the exception of unconstitutionality the author shows that at the time of committing the incriminated acts respectively on.
August and August the provisions of art. of Law no. which decreed regarding the quality of a notary that it ceases in the case of a final conviction for the intentional commission of a serious crime or that affects the prestige of the profession.of the act was to be carried out under the conditions of the Regulation on the application of Law no. and depending on this analysis the termination of the notary status was ordered. Art. para. from Law no. in the form existing at the time the acts were committed provided that the termination of the notarys capacity is determined or ordered as the case may be by the Mi#####ster of Justice specifying that in accordance with the.